go to the AUS-e-TUTE homepage

Periodic Table: Trends in Properties of Group 1 Elements (alkali metals) Chemistry Tutorial

Key Concepts

Please do not block ads on this website.
No ads = no money for us = no free stuff for you!

Table of Data for Group 1 Elements

The table below gives the name, atomic number, electronic configuration of the atom, the first and second ionisation energy, melting point, density and electronegativity, of the Group 1 elements (alkali metals).

Carefully inspect this data to find trends, or patterns, in the properties of group 1 elements.

These patterns, or trends, recur throughout the periodic table and are referred to more generally as periodic trends, or, as periodicity.

Period Name
(Symbol)
Atomic Number
(Z)
Simple Electronic Configuration Atomic Radius
(pm)
First Ionization Energy
(kJ mol-1)
Second Ionization Energy
(kJ mol-1)
Melting point
(°C)
Density
(g cm-3)
Electronegativity
(Pauling)
2 Lithium
(Li)
3 2,1 152 526 7296 180 0.54 0.98

3 Sodium
(Na)
11 2,8,1 186 504 4563 98 0.97 0.93

4 Potassium
(K)
19 2,8,8,1 231 425 3069 64 0.86 0.82

5 Rubidium
(Rb)
37 2,8,18,8,1 244 410 2650 39 1.5 0.82

6 Ceasium
(Cs)
55 2,8,18,18,8,1 262 380 2420 29 1.9 0.79

7 Francium
(Fr)
87 2,8,18,32,18,8,1   370 2170 27   0.7

Do you know this?

Join AUS-e-TUTE!

Play the game now!

Trends in Electronic Configuration of Group 1 Elements

Consider the electronic configuration of group 1 elements. Can you see a trend (a pattern)?

name electronic configuration
lithium 2,1
sodium 2,8,1
potassium 2,8,8,1
rubidium 2,8,18,8,1
caesium 2,8,18,18,8,1
francium 2,8,18,32,18,8,1

Atoms of group 1 elements have just 1 electron in the highest energy level (also known as the valence shell of electrons).

It is even easier to see this if we use a short-hand description of the electronic configuration of each atom in which the electrons that make up part of a Noble Gas (group 18) electron configuration are represented in square brackets followed by the number of electrons in the valence shell.
We have done this in the table below:

name short-hand electronic configuration
lithium [He],1
sodium [Ne],1
potassium [Ar],1
rubidium [Kr],1
caesium [Xe],1
francium [Rn],1

If an atom (M) of a group 1 element lost that valence electron (e-), then the ion of the group 1 element would have a charge of +1 (M+) as shown in the equations below:

General equation: M M+ + e-
examples: Li Li+ + e-
Na Na+ + e-
K K+ + e-
Rb Rb+ + e-
Cs Cs+ + e-
Fr Fr+ + e-

And, the positively charged ion (cation) formed would have the same electronic configuration as a group 18 (Noble Gas) element, we say that the cation is isoelectronic with the Noble Gas, as shown below:

name electronic configuration
Li+ [He]
Na+ [Ne]
K+ [Ar]
Rb+ [Kr]
Cs+ [Xe]
Fr+ [Rn]

and the cation of a group 1 element would therefore be chemically very stable (that is, no longer very reactive), just like a Noble Gas (group 18 element).

So, just how likely is it that a group 1 element will lose that valence electron and form a cation .....

Trends in Ionisation Energy of Group 1 Elements

Ionisation energy (or ionization energy) is the energy required to remove an electron from a gaseous species.

First ionisation energy (or first ionization energy) refers to the energy required to remove an electron from a gaseous atom.

We can write a general equation to describe the removal of an electron (e-) from a gaseous atom (M(g)) to produce a gaseous cation with a charge of +1 (M+(g)) as:

M(g) → M+(g) + e-

So, the first ionisation energy for lithium refers to the energy required to remove 1 electron (e-) from an atom of lithium which is in the gaseous state (Li(g)).
The products of the reaction are an electron and a gaseous lithium ion with a charge of +1 (Li+(g)).

We can represent the first ionisation of each group 1 element as shown below:

examples: Li(g) Li+(g) + e-
Na(g) Na+(g) + e-
K(g) K+(g) + e-
Rb(g) Rb+(g) + e-
Cs(g) Cs+(g) + e-
Fr(g) Fr+(g) + e-

If the value of the first ionisation energy is high, then lots of energy is required to remove the electron, and the reaction is less likely to occur readily.
If the value of the first ionisation energy is low, then little is required to remove the electron, and the reaction is more likely to occur readily.

So, let's look at the values for the first ionisation energy for each group 1 element:

First Ionisation Reaction First Ionisation Energy (kJ mol-1) Trend in First Ionisation Energy
Li(g) Li+(g) + e- 526 highest
Na(g) Na+(g) + e- 504
K(g) K+(g) + e- 425
Rb(g) Rb+(g) + e- 410
Cs(g) Cs+(g) + e- 380
Fr(g) Fr+(g) + e- 370 lowest

As you go down group 1 from top to bottom, it gets easier to remove the valence electron and form the positively charged cation.
Group 1 elements increase in chemical reactivity as you go down the group from top to bottom.

We have evidence for the stability of the electronic configuration of the group 1 cations based on inspection of the values for the second ionisation for this group.
Second ionisation energy refers to the amount of energy required to remove an electron (e-) from the gaseous singly charged cation (M+(g)) to form a gaseous cation with a charge of 2+ (M2+(g)):

M+(g) → M2+(g) + e-

Let's compare the values for the first ionisation energy and the second ionisation energy for each element in group 1:

First Ionisation Reaction First Ionisation Energy (kJ mol-1) Second Ionisation Reaction Second Ionisation Energy (kJ mol-1)
Li(g) Li+(g) + e- 526 Li+(g) Li2+(g) + e- 7296
Na(g) Na+(g) + e- 504 Na+(g) Na2+(g) + e- 4563
K(g) K+(g) + e- 425 K+(g) K2+(g) + e- 3069
Rb(g) Rb+(g) + e- 410 Rb+(g) Rb2+(g) + e- 2650
Cs(g) Cs+(g) + e- 380 Cs+(g) Cs2+(g) + e- 2420
Fr(g) Fr+(g) + e- 370 Fr+(g) Fr2+(g) + e- 2170

Note that second ionisation decreases down the group, just like first ionisation energy, but, the values for the second ionisation energy are much, much, larger than the values for the first ionisation energy.
It is about 10 times harder to remove an electron from the M+(g) ion compared to removing an electron from the M(g) which provides evidence for the stability of the electron configuration of the M+(g) ion.

But why is that 1 valence electron easier to remove as you go down group 1 .....

Trends in Atomic Radius of Group 1 Elements

First, lets think about the number of electron shells (or energy levels) being filled to make an atom of each group 1 element:

name electronic configuration Number of occupied energy levels
lithium 2,1 2
sodium 2,8,1 3
potassium 2,8,8,1 4
rubidium 2,8,18,8,1 5
caesium 2,8,18,18,8,1 6
francium 2,8,18,32,18,8,1 7

As you go down group 1 from top to bottom, you are adding a whole new "electron shell" to the electronic configuration of each atom.
Surely that will increase the size of each atom as you go down the group?
We record the "size" of an atom using its "atomic radius".
Consider the values for the atomic radius of each of the atoms in group 1 as shown in the table below:

name atomic radius (pm) Trend
lithium 152 smallest
sodium 186
potassium 425
rubidium 244
caesium 262 largest

As you go down group 1 from top to bottom the radius of the atom of each successive element increases.
This means that the negatively charged valence electron gets further away from the positively charged nucleus and w say that the electron is 'shielded'.
So, the positively charged nucleus has less of a "pull" on the valence electron as you go down the group.
Therefore, the valence electron is easier to remove, and therefore the ionisation energy decreases down the group as discussed in the previous section.

All of this makes Group 1 metals very reactive..... but just how reactive are they?

Trends in Reactivity of Group 1 Metals

All Group 1 metals react with water (if you haven't seen this then you should go search for some YouTube videos).
We can represent the overall reaction of a group 1 metal (M(s)) with water (H2O(l)) to form an aqueous metal hydroxide (MOH(aq)) and hydrogen gas (H2(g)) as:

general equation M(s) + H2O(l) MOH(aq) + ½H2(g)

If you cut off a thin slice of lithium and place it in a beaker of room temperature water the reaction will take place slowly, you will see bubbles of hydrogen gas being produced.

Cut off a thin slice of sodium and place it in room temperature water and the piece of sodium will whiz around the water because the reaction producing the hydrogen gas is a bit more vigorous.

If you do the same with a thin fresh slice of potassium the reaction is even more vigorous, it will probably produce a flame, maybe an audible "pop".

If you do the same thing with a thin fresh slice of caesium it will definitely "pop" and produce flame!
The pop is the explosion due to the rapid production, and ignition, of hydrogen gas!

This is a demonstration to show that the reactivity of group 1 metals with water increases as you go down the group from top to bottom.

The results are summarised in the table below:

chemical equation Trend in Reactivity
Li(s) + H2O(l) LiOH(aq) + ½H2(g) slower
Na (s) + H2O(l) NaOH(aq) + ½H2(g)
K(s) + H2O(l) KOH(aq) + ½H2(g)
Rb(s) + H2O(l) RbOH(aq) + ½H2(g)
Cs(s) + H2O(l) CsOH(aq) + ½H2(g) faster

Group 1 metals (alkali metals) will react with lots of non-metals, even oxygen (O2(g)) in the atmosphere as shown below:

Group 1 metal + oxygen gas compound formula(5) Systematic IUPC Name
(non-systematic name) (6)
4Li(m) + O2(g) 2Li2O(s) dilithium oxide
(lithium oxide)
2Na(m) + O2(g) Na2O2(s) disodium (dioxide)
sodium dioxide(2-)
(sodium peroxide)
K(m) + O2(g) KO2(s) monopotassium (dioxide)
potassium dioxide(1-)
(potassium superoxide)
Rb(m) + O2(g) RbO2(s) monorubidium (dioxide)
rubidium dioxide(1-)
(rubudium superoxide)
Cs(m) + O2(g) CsO2(s) monocaesium (dioxide)
caesium dioxide(1-)
(caesium superoxide)

The Group 1 metals (alkali metals) react so readily with water and oxygen in the atmosphere that storage of these elements is a problem!
This is why group 1 elements are stored in jars filled with a "water-hating"(7) hydrocarbon solvent such as paraffin oil, cyclohexane or kerosene.(8)

Do you understand this?

Join AUS-e-TUTE!

Take the test now!

Trends in the Density of Group 1 Elements

Density refers to how much mass of substance is present in a given volume.
Density of a solid is usually measured in units of grams per cubic centimetre (g cm-3).
Consider the density of group 1 elements as given in the table below:

name density (g cm-3) Trend
lithium 0.54 least dense
sodium 0.97  
potassium 0.86  
rubidium 1.5  
caesium 1.9 most dense

If we took a cube of lithium measuring 1 cm × 1 cm × 1 cm, then this cube would have a mass of 0.54 g.
A 1 cm × 1 cm × 1 cm cube of sodium would have a greater mass, 0.97 g

As you go down group 1 from top to bottom, the mass of a cubic centimetre of element has a tendency to increase.
That is, the density of group 1 elements shows a "general trend" of increasing as you go down the group from top to bottom.

As you go down group 1 from top to bottom, the mass of the element present per unit volume, in general, increases.
It should be noted that the density of group 1 (alkali metals) is less than that of transition metals because of the group 1 elements' larger atomic radii.
For example, the density of iron, a transition metal, is about 7.87 g cm-1.

Trends in the Melting Point of Group 1 Elements

At 25°C and normal atmospheric pressure (100 kPa), group 1 metals exist as solids.
The atoms of each element occupy a place within a 3-dimensional array, or metallic lattice, of atoms.
The atoms of metals are held together in the lattice by metallic bonds.
If enough heat energy is supplied to discrupt this arrangement of atoms, the regularity of the lattice breaks down and the solid metal melts.
The melting point of a metal therefore indicates how much energy needs to be supplied to melt the solid metal.
A high melting point means lots of energy is required to melt the solid, but a low melting point means little energy is required to melt the solid.
We can then infer that the interactions between the metal atoms in a high melting point solid must be greater than the interactions between atoms in low melting point solid.
So a high melting point suggests the metallic bonds between metal atoms is stronger, while a lower melting point suggest the metallic bonds between the metal atoms are weaker.

So, let's compare the melting points of our group 1 metals..

name melting point (°C) Trend
lithium 180 highest
sodium 98
potassium 64
rubidium 39
caesium 29
francium 27 lowest

First of all we would note that none of the melting points are very high compared to other metals, for example, the melting point of iron is about 1500°C!
This is because Group 1 metals have only 1 electron to contribute the delocalised "sea of electrons" making up the metallic bond and because group 1 metal atoms tend to be larger than other metal atoms it means that these delocalised electrons are further away from the nucleus, so the metallic bond of Group 1 metals is generally weaker than of other metals.

We can identify a trend in the melting points of group 1 elements: the melting point decreases as you go down the group from top to bottom.
As the atomic radius increases down the group, the delocalised electrons making up the metallic bond get further from the nucleus so the metallic bond gets weaker and easier to weaken as you go down the group.

Can you apply this?

Join AUS-e-TUTE!

Take the exam now!

Problem Solving using StoPGoPS method

Question: On the lab bench are three jars labelled X, Y and Z.
All the jars contain a sample of a Group 1 element (alkali metal) suspended in paraffin oil.
Chris the Chemist has conducted some tests to try to identify the element in each jar.
The results of these tests are shown in the table below:

element reaction with oxygen formula of oxide relative first ionisation energy
X rapid X2O2 1.18
Y slow Y2O 1.23
Z violent ZO2 1.00

Determine which of the elements, X, Y or Z is most likely to be lithium.

STOP STOP! State the Question.
  What is the question asking you to do?
Identify which element is lithium.
PAUSE PAUSE to Prepare a Game Plan
  (1) What information (data) have you been given in the question?

(a) X, Y and Z are all Group 1 elements (alkali metals)

(b) Data on each element's rate of reaction with oxygen, formula of oxide formed, and relative first ionisation energy as given in the table:

element reaction with oxygen formula of oxide relative first ionisation energy
X rapid X2O2 1.18
Y slow Y2O 1.23
Z violent ZO2 1.00

(2) What is the relationship between what you know and what you need to find out?

(a) Reaction rate (reactivity) increases down group 1 from top to bottom

(b) First ionisation energy decreases down group 1 from top to bottom

(c) Lithium is the first element in Group 1 (at the top of group 1)

GO GO with the Game Plan
 

Re-organise the data so that the reaction rate with oxygen trends slow to rapid to violent down the group and the first ionisation energy should tend to decrease down the same group:

element reaction with oxygen formula of oxide relative first ionisation energy
Y slow
Y2O 1.23
X
 
rapid
X2O2
 
1.18
Z violent ZO2 1.00

Lithium, the first element of group 1, will be:
(i) the least reactive
(ii) have the highest first ionisation energy

Element Y is most likely to be lithum.

PAUSE PAUSE to Ponder Plausibility
  Is your answer plausible?

Alkali metals react with oxygen to form ionic oxides, but the formula of those oxides formed at room temperature and pressure differs:
4Li(s) + O2(g) → 2Li2O(s)
2Na(s) + O2(g) → Na2O2(s)
K(s) + O2(g) → KO2(s)

The oxide of lithium, Li2O, agrees with the formula for the oxide of Y, Y2O, so Y is most likely to be lithium.

Since this agrees with the answer we got above, we are reasonably confident that our answer is plausible.

STOP STOP! State the Solution
  Element Y is lithium.

Can you apply this?

Join AUS-e-TUTE!

Take the exam now!


(1) The word "alkali" is said to be derived from an ancient Arabic word for "plant ashes". Sodium and potassium compounds are both found in the ashes of burnt plant material.

(2) IUPAC recognises both "cesium" and the alternative spelling of "caesium".
However, it should be noted that on the IUPAC's periodic table the spelling of this element's name is caesium.

(3) Francium occurs naturally only in minute amounts and all its isotopes are radioactive.

(4) Contrast these compounds of Group 1 metals to compounds of transition metals which are typically more covalent in character and coloured!

(5) Do not be confused by the formulae of these ionic compounds. Remember that an ionic compound represents the ratio of cations and anions that are packed together in crystal lattice, its empirical formula.
Each group 1 element can still be an ion with a charge of +1, but how those ions are packed together with the oxygen anions determines the empirical formula of the oxide and leads to a change in the "oxidation number" of the oxygen "atom".
Oxidation state of group 1 "atoms" in a compound is always +1
Oxidation state of oxygen in Li2O is -2
Oxidation state of oxygen in Na2O2 is -1
Oxidation state of oxygen in KO2 is -½

(6) reference "Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry: IUPAC Recommendations 2005" (Red Book)

(7) Water, being a polar molecule, does not readily mix with hydrocarbons which are non-polar molecules.
You can find out more about these intermolecular forces of attraction in the intermolecular forces tutorial.

(8) There is another problem, and that is that the salts of alkali metals, particularly sodium and potassium are extremely soluble in water so a quick precipitation test for the presence of Na+(aq) or K+(aq) isn't going to work. Instead, we can use a flame test to readily identify Na+(aq) by its brilliant, persistent yellow flame, but the K+(aq) is harder to see since it is a fleeting pale violet colour.