Trends in Electronegativities in Groups of the Periodic Table
In general, the electronegativities of the elements in a Group of the periodic table decrease as you go down the group from top to bottom.
As the atomic radius2 increases and the number of completed electron shells ( energy levels) increases going down the group, the power of the atom's nucleus to attract electrons to itself decreases.
Group |
Atomic Radius Trend |
Electronegativity Trend |
top element |
period 2 element |
smallest |
most electronegative |
↓ |
period 3 element |
↓ |
↑ |
↓ |
period 4 element |
↓ |
↑ |
↓ |
period 5 element |
↓ |
↑ |
bottom element |
period 6 element |
largest |
least electronegative |
We will consider the trends in the electronegativity of group 1 elements and group 17 elements in the sections below.
(A) Trends in the Electronegativity of Group 1 (IA, Alkali Metals) Elements
Consider the data for the elements of group 1 in the table below.
Can you see a pattern (trend) in the size of the atoms and their electronegativity?
|
Element |
Atomic Number (Z) |
Symbol |
Atomic Radius (pm)3 |
Electronegativity |
Trend |
period 2 |
lithium |
3 |
Li |
134 |
0.98 |
most electronegative ↓ |
period 3 |
sodium |
11 |
Na |
154 |
0.93 |
↓ |
period 4 |
potassium |
19 |
K |
196 |
0.82 |
↓ |
period 5 |
rubidium |
37 |
Rb |
211 |
0.82 |
↓ |
period 6 |
cesium |
55 |
Cs |
225 |
0.79 |
↓ least electronegative |
Did you notice that as you go down the group from top to bottom:
- Atomic radius increases (from 134 pm for Li to 225 pm for Cs)
- Electronegativity decreases (from 0.98 for Li to 0.79 for Cs)
As the atomic radius increases and the number of completed electron shells ( energy levels) increases going down the group, the power of the atom's nucleus to attract electrons to itself decreases.
(B) Trends in the Electronegativity of Group 17 (VIIA, Halogens) Elements
Consider the data for the elements of group 17 in the table below.
Can you see a pattern (trend) in the size of the atoms and their electronegativity?
|
Element |
Atomic Number (Z) |
Symbol |
Atomic Radius (pm) |
Electronegativity |
Trend |
Period 2 |
fluorine |
9 |
F |
71 |
3.98 |
most electronegative ↓ |
Period 3 |
chlorine |
17 |
Cl |
99 |
3.16 |
↓ |
Period 4 |
bromine |
35 |
Br |
114 |
2.96 |
↓ |
Period 5 |
iodine |
53 |
I |
133 |
2.66 |
↓ lowest electronegativity |
Did you notice that as you go down the group from top to bottom:
- Atomic radius increases (from 71 pm for F to 133 pm for I)
- Electronegativity decreases (from 3.98 for F to 2.66 for I)
As the atomic radius increases and the number of completed electron shells ( energy levels) increases going down the group, the power of the atom's nucleus to attract electrons to itself decreases.
Trends in Electronegativity of the Elements in Periods of the Periodic Table
In general, electronegativities of the elements in the same Period increases as you go from left to right across the period.
As the nuclear charge increases and the atomic radius decreases across a period, the power of the atom's nucleus to attract electrons to itself increases.
|
atomic radius decreases across a period from left to right |
|
largest atom |
→ |
→ |
→ |
smallest atom |
a period |
Group 1 element |
Group 2 element |
|
Group 13 element |
Group 14 element |
Group 15 element |
Group 16 element |
Group 17 element |
|
lowest electronegativity |
→ |
→ |
→ |
highest electronegativity |
|
electronegativity increases across a period from left to right |
In the next section we will look at the trends in the electronegativities of elements in period and period 3 of the periodic table.
(A) Trends in the Electronegativity of Elements in Period 2 of the Periodic Table
Consider the data in the table below for elements in period 2 of the periodic table.
Can you see any patters (trends) in
- atomic radius
- electronegativity
Element |
Li |
Be |
B |
C |
N |
O |
F |
Atomic Number (Z) |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Atomic Radius (pm) |
134 |
90 |
82 |
77 |
75 |
73 |
71 |
Electronegativity |
0.98 |
1.57 |
2.04 |
2.55 |
3.04 |
3.44 |
3.98 |
General Trend |
least electronegative |
→ |
→ |
→ |
→ |
→ |
most electronegative |
Did you notice that as you go across period 2 from left to right
- atomic radius decreases (from 134 pm for Li to 71 pm for F)
- electronegativity increases (from 0.98 for Li to 3.98 for F)
As the nuclear charge increases and the atomic radius decreases across a period, the power of the atom's nucleus to attract electrons to itself increases.
(B) Trends in the Electronegativity of Elements in Period 3 of the Periodic Table
Consider the data in the table below for elements in period 3 of the periodic table.
Can you see any patters (trends) in
- atomic radius
- electronegativity
Element |
Na |
Mg |
Al |
Si |
P |
S |
Cl |
Atomic Number (Z) |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
Atomic Radius (pm) |
154 |
130 |
118 |
111 |
106 |
102 |
99 |
Electronegativity |
0.93 |
1.31 |
1.61 |
1.9 |
2.19 |
2.58 |
3.16 |
General Trend |
least electronegative |
→ |
→ |
→ |
→ |
→ |
most electronegative |
Did you notice that as you go across period 3 from left to right
- atomic radius decreases (from 154 pm for Na to 99 pm for Cl)
- electronegativity increases (from 0.93 for Na to 3.16 for Cl)
As the nuclear charge increases and the atomic radius decreases across a period, the power of the atom's nucleus to attract electrons to itself increases.
Footnotes
1. We will be excluding transition metals, lanthanoids (lanthanides) and actinoids (actinides) from the disucssion
2. The values for atomic radii provided here are approximations derived from interatomic-distance measurements.
There are a number of different ways of approaching the measurement of atomic and ionic radii. We are not going to discuss any of them, we are just going to use some nicely behaved approximations to illustrate some general trends.
3. Common units for the reporting of atomic radii are the picometre (as used here), the nanometre, and the angstrom.
1 pm = 1 picometre = 10-12 metre
1 Å = 1 angstrom = 10-10 metre
1 nm = 1 nanometre = 10-9 metre
Conversion example for the atomic radius of lithium,
134 pm = 134 × 10-12 m = 0.134 × 10-9 m = 0.134 nm
134 pm = 134 × 10-12 m = 1.34 × 10-10 m = 1.34 Å